Outside providence movie#

Which is it? Moment of decision, or setup for a silly scene where he hops up and down outside a dean's window to get his attention? 'Outside Providence'' is so unsuccessful in so many different ways that maybe the whole project was doomed. When Dunph gets in big trouble for having Jane in his room, it's handled as a life-changing experience on the one hand, and as a sitcom opportunity on the other. There's an uneasy truce between the heartfelt family stuff and the standard prep school high jinks. What happened, and why, and should Dunph blame his father? We hardly care, because the dialogue is so ham-handed that the illusion of reality is broken and we can see the acting itself we're aware of Baldwin and Hatosy struggling with lines that contain information but don't put it in context-it's payoff without setup, bathos when it should be pathos. The screenplay lumbers from one obligatory scene to the next, pausing most painfully at a big dramatic climax where Dunph and his dad have a heart-to-heart about his dead mother. Sent away to an exclusive Connecticut boarding school, he finds richer versions of the same kinds of friends now they smoke dope on the roof outside their dorm windows. Dunph (as he understandably prefers to be called) hangs out with his dopehead friends, smoking reefer atop the local water tower (surely the police would never notice them there). The hero is a Pawtucket teenager named Tim Dunphy ( Shawn Hatosy), whose father (Baldwin) calls him 'Dildo''-the kind of detail that could be true in life but never feels true in the movies. The kid brother would have been OK if he'd been better developed as a character, not just window dressing and a setup for one-liners ('we were playing touch football and he fell off the roof''). I could also have done without the little brother in the wheelchair, and the three-legged family dog with an eye patch. What are we to make of a scene where the characters are smoking dope in a car, and an exterior shot shows the car trailing so much smoke it looks on fire? In Cheech and Chong, yes. Corrente can direct (I liked his 1995 film 'Federal Hill,'' set in Providence), but this time he has an underdone screenplay and compensates by pushing too hard.

Outside providence movie#

The movie was directed by Michael Corrente and written by Corrente and the Farrellys, based on a novel by Peter Farrelly. And the school faculty contains nothing but archetypes (a befuddled Mr. Its construction is so amateurish that a basic character change (the hero stops screwing around and starts studying) is blown off with a film-school montage (reads books, gets approving nod from teacher, etc.). Alas, it is badly written and severely miscast Alec Baldwin, as a working-class stiff with a Rhode Island accent, sweats over every syllable. If it had been well-made, 'Outside Providence'' might have overcome its genre and amounted to something.